Archive for the ‘Consolidated Financial Statements’ Category

Reasons For Exclusion From Consolidation

Monday, October 22nd, 2007

It is not necessary that a parent company must consolidate all its subsidiaries. Tabulate below some of the reasons that a parent company needs not to do consolidation for its subsidiaries:-

Exclusion From Consolidation Under IAS 27

A parent company is exempted from presenting consolidated financial statements where it is:

(a)  a wholly owned subsidiary; or

(b)  a virtually wholly owned subsidiary and it obtains the approval of the owners of the minority interest not to present consolidated financial statements. A virtually-own subsidiary is one in which the parent owns 90% or more of the voting power.

 

IAS 27 allows only two(2) circumstances when a subsidiary is excluded from consolidation. They are when:

(a)  control is temporary because the subsidiary is acquired and held exclusively with a view to its subsequent disposal in the near future; or

(b)  it operates under severe long-term restrictions which significantly impair its ability to transfer funds to its parent.

Definition Of Control In Consolidation Exercise

Monday, October 22nd, 2007

It’s crucial that we need to understand what is control otherwise there is no rationale to do a consolidation. Append below the definition of Control:-

Definition Of Control Under IAS 27
1.      IAS 27 defines control as “ the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an enterprise so as to derive benefits from its activities”
2.   Control is presumed to exist when the investor owns, directly or indirectly more than one half of the voting power of an investee.
3.   IAS 27 set out the situations where control is present even though the investor owns less than one half of the voting power of the investee company:
      (a) power over more than one half of the voting rights by virtue of an agreement with  other investors;
      (b) power to govern the financial and operating policies of the company under statute or an agreement;
      © power to appoint or remove the majority of the members of the board of directors or equivalent governing body;
      (d) power to cast the majority of votes at meetings of the board of directors or equivalent governing body.
 

Definition Of A Subsidiary

Monday, October 22nd, 2007

Before we can do any basic consolidation exercise, we need to at least understand what is a subsidiary. Append below is the definition:

Definition Of Subsidiary

Companies Act defines a subsidiary company as one:

(a) in which the investor company

     (i)    controls the composition of the board of directors of the investee company;

     (ii)   controls more than one half of the voting power of the investee company; or

     (iii)  holds more than one half of the issued shared capital ( excluding preference   shares); or 

(b) which is a subsidiary of a subsidiary of the investor company.

           

Illustration:

The investor company is the holding company of the investee company if the investee company is its subsidiary. For example H holds more than 50% of the equity shares of S1,S2,S3. Therefore H, S1, S2 and S3 form a group, with H being the holding company and the other companies being subsidiaries of H.

Consolidated Financial Statements Complied With IFRS & IAS

Monday, October 22nd, 2007

Consolidated Financials are prepared in accordance with the following IFRS and IAS:

  •  IAS 27 “Consolidated Financial Statements”
  • IAS 28 “Accounting for Investments in Associates”
  • IAS 31 “Financial Reporting of Interest in Joint-Ventures”
  •  IAS 39 “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement”
  •  IFRS 3 “Business Combinations”

 

IAS 28 :Accounting for Investments in Associates

 

  1. An associate is an enterprise, other than a subsidiary or joint venture, over which the investor has significant influence. Significant influence means the power to participate in financial and operating policy decisions. Such influence is presumed to exist if the investor owns more that 20 per cent of the associate.

 

  1. Associates should be accounted for by the equity method in consolidated financial statements. However, if an investment was acquired and held exclusively with an intent to dispose of it in the near future, it should be accounted for by the cost method.

 

  1. Under the equity method, the investor recognises its proportionate share of the associate’s reported net profit or loss whether or not remitted as a dividend. The investor must amortise any goodwill implicit in the investment.

 

  1. An investor should discontinue using the equity method if (a) it ceases to have significant influence over the associate or the associate operates under long-term restrictions that impair its ability to transfer funds to the investor.

  

  1. Long-term investments should be valued at cost, at revalued amount, or for marketable equity securities at the lower of cost or market on a portfolio basis.

 

  1. Permanent diminutions in value should be recognised and measured on an individual basis.